A collection of PostHog skills for enhancing AI-assisted workflows. Add this repo as a Claude Code plugin marketplace to get access to all PostHog skills: Then install individual plugins: Or browse available plugins: Copy any skill directory to .claude/skills/ in your project: Any directory under skills/ that contains a .claude-plugin/plugin.json is automatically discovered and added to the market
Add this skill
npx mdskills install PostHog/authoring-log-alerts@PostHog? Sign in with GitHub to claim this listing.Comprehensive workflow for authoring low-noise log alerts with measurement-driven thresholds and validation
1---2name: authoring-log-alerts3description: >4 Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up5 alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring.6 Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and7 shipping with a notification destination.8---910# Authoring log alerts1112Authoring an alert is a _measurement_ problem, not a guessing problem. You are not trying to be exhaustive — you13are trying to land thresholds that fire 0–3 times per week on real production patterns, on services that matter.1415## When to use this skill1617- The user asks to "set up alerts" / "suggest alerts" for their project.18- The user wants to evaluate whether a service is producing alertable signal.19- The user has just enabled log alerting and wants a starter set.2021## When _not_ to use this skill2223- Tuning an alert that already exists — that's a different job (use `posthog:logs-alerts-events-list` to inspect24 fire/resolve cadence and `posthog:logs-alerts-partial-update` to adjust).25- Investigating an active incident — pull rows with `posthog:query-logs`, don't author an alert mid-incident.2627## Tools2829| Tool | Job | Where it fits |30| --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ |31| `posthog:logs-services` | Top-25 services in window with log_count, error_count, error_rate, sparkline. | Step 1 — triage. |32| `posthog:logs-attributes-list` / `posthog:logs-attribute-values-list` | Discover keys/values for narrower filters. | Step 2, optional. |33| `posthog:logs-count-ranges` | Adaptive time-bucketed counts for a filter. | Step 3 — baseline. |34| `posthog:logs-alerts-simulate-create` | Replay a draft config against `-7d` history with full state machine. | Step 4 — validate. |35| `posthog:logs-alerts-create` | Persist the alert. | Step 5 — ship. |36| `posthog:logs-alerts-destinations-create` | Wire the alert to Slack or webhook. | Step 5 — ship. |3738Do **not** call `posthog:query-logs` during authoring. You need distributions, not rows. Reserve `posthog:query-logs` for39the very end if the user asks "show me a sample of what would have fired" — `limit: 10` is plenty.4041## Workflow4243### 1. Triage — pick candidate services4445Call `posthog:logs-services` for the last 24h with no filters. The response is capped at 25 services and includes a46sparkline, so it is small and bounded.4748A service is a candidate when **both** are true:4950- `log_count` is non-trivial (≥ ~1k in 24h — quieter services produce too little signal to alert on).51- `error_rate` is non-zero, **or** the user has named the service explicitly.5253Skip services with high volume but `error_rate == 0` unless the user wants a volume-shape alert (e.g. "warn me54if api-gateway suddenly stops producing logs"). Volume-floor alerts use `threshold_operator: below` and need55different reasoning — see [references/volume-floor-alerts.md](./references/volume-floor-alerts.md).5657If the user names a service, treat it as a candidate even without error signal.5859### 2. (Optional) Narrow the filter6061If a service has many error sub-types, an alert on "all errors" is usually too broad. Use62`posthog:logs-attributes-list` (try `attribute_type: log`) and `posthog:logs-attribute-values-list` to find a discriminator —63common ones are `http.status_code`, `error.type`, `k8s.container.name`. Add the narrowing filter to your draft.6465Keep it simple: one severity filter + one or two attribute filters is plenty. Multi-clause filters are66harder to reason about and rarely improve precision.6768### 3. Baseline — characterise the candidate over 7 days6970Call `posthog:logs-count-ranges` with the candidate's filters, `dateRange: { date_from: "-7d" }`, and71`targetBuckets: 24` (one bucket ≈ 7h). The response gives you bucket counts.7273**Do not eyeball the percentiles or scale the threshold to the alert window manually.** Pipe the74count-ranges response into the helper script:7576```bash77echo '<count-ranges JSON>' | python3 scripts/baseline_stats.py --window-minutes 578```7980The script returns:8182```json83{84 "n_buckets": 12,85 "bucket_minutes": 420.0,86 "alert_window_minutes": 5,87 "stats": { "p50": 12.0, "p95": 71.25, "p99": 126.25, "max": 140 },88 "suggested_threshold_count": 5,89 "rationale": "max(p99=126.25, median*3=36.0, floor=5) scaled from 420m bucket to 5m window",90 "health": []91}92```9394Use `suggested_threshold_count` as your starting threshold. Read `health`:9596| `health` flag | What it means | What to do |97| ----------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |98| `sparse:N_of_M_buckets` | Too few non-empty buckets for a 7d baseline. | Widen filter, extend to `-30d`, or skip. |99| `empty` | All buckets are zero. | Skip — no signal. |100| `spiky` | `max` is 10×+ `p95`. | Count-threshold alerts work well. Proceed. |101| `flat` | `p95` ≈ `p50`. | Be cautious — either no incidents in lookback, or the metric is too smooth. Try a longer lookback or skip. |102| `[]` (empty) | Healthy distribution. | Proceed. |103104### 4. Draft and simulate105106Pick a starter draft from these defaults — see [references/threshold-defaults.md](./references/threshold-defaults.md)107for the reasoning:108109| Setting | Default | Notes |110| --------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |111| `threshold_count` | `suggested_threshold_count` from the script | Already scaled to the alert window. |112| `threshold_operator` | `above` | Use `below` only for volume-floor alerts. |113| `window_minutes` | `5` | Allowed: 5, 10, 15, 30, 60. Must match what you passed to the script. |114| `evaluation_periods` | `3` | M in N-of-M. |115| `datapoints_to_alarm` | `2` | N in N-of-M. 2-of-3 reduces flap from a single noisy bucket. |116| `cooldown_minutes` | `30` | Minimum time between repeat fires. |117118Call `posthog:logs-alerts-simulate-create` with these settings and `date_from: "-7d"`. The response gives you `fire_count`119and `resolve_count`.120121### 5. Iterate — three rounds, then ship or skip122123Target: `fire_count` between 0 and ~3 over `-7d`. If outside the band:124125| Outcome | Adjustment |126| --------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |127| `fire_count` = 0 over 7d _and_ the baseline was spiky | Lower `threshold_count` toward `stats.p95` from the script, or drop to 1-of-2. |128| `fire_count` = 0 _and_ the baseline was flat | The service has no alertable signal. Skip it; log why. |129| `fire_count` > 5 | Raise `threshold_count` toward `stats.max` from the script, or move to 3-of-5 for a smoother window. |130| `fire_count` is fine but resolve_count never matches fire_count | Cooldown is too long, or the underlying state is genuinely sticky. Acceptable for now. |131132When adjusting the threshold, **read values from the script's `stats` block — never recompute percentiles133by hand.**134135Cap iteration at **3 simulate calls per candidate**. If you can't land in the band in 3 rounds, the metric136is wrong — either the filter is too broad, the window is wrong, or the service genuinely doesn't have a137threshold-shape signal. Note it and move on.138139### 6. Ship — create + attach destination140141Once a draft simulates cleanly:1421431. Call `posthog:logs-alerts-create` with the validated config. Use a name like `<service> error rate (auto)` so the144 user can see at a glance which alerts came from this skill.1452. Call `posthog:logs-alerts-destinations-create` to wire it to a notification target. **An alert with no destination146 is silent.** Always confirm the channel name or webhook URL with the user before attaching — never wire147 an auto-generated alert to a production channel without explicit confirmation. If the user is unsure,148 suggest a low-traffic testing channel for the first few alerts.149150If the user wants alerts created in `enabled: false` state for review-then-flip, pass `enabled: false` to151`-create` and tell them how many drafts you produced.152153## Filter shape — required154155The `filters` field on `posthog:logs-alerts-create` takes a subset of `LogsViewerFilters` and **must contain at156least one of**:157158- `severityLevels` — list of `["trace","debug","info","warn","error","fatal"]`159- `serviceNames` — list of service name strings160- `filterGroup` — property filter group161162The same shape goes into `posthog:logs-alerts-simulate-create`'s `filters` field. Match the simulate filters to the alert filters163exactly — otherwise the simulation is testing a different alert than the one you ship.164165Example minimum:166167```json168{169 "severityLevels": ["error", "fatal"],170 "serviceNames": ["api-gateway"]171}172```173174## Token-economy rules175176- One `posthog:logs-services` call at the start, not per-candidate.177- One `posthog:logs-count-ranges` call per candidate at `targetBuckets: 24`. Don't go above 30 during authoring.178- ≤ 3 `posthog:logs-alerts-simulate-create` calls per candidate.179- Zero `posthog:query-logs` calls during the authoring loop.180- Prefer reporting a small set of well-validated alerts over a long list of unvalidated drafts.181182## Output183184Report what you did, in this shape:185186- For each shipped alert: name, filters, threshold, simulated fire_count over 7d, destination.187- For each skipped candidate: service name + why (flat baseline, can't land threshold, low volume).188- Total simulate calls made, total alerts created.189190The user should be able to read this and decide whether to disable any drafts before they go live.191
Full transparency — inspect the skill content before installing.